Committee on Industry, Minerals and Energy
ASEAN Industrial Projects
The year 1981-1982 saw several significant
developments in the implementation of the AIP
scheme. In their Eleventh Meeting in Jakarta on
29-30 May 1981, the ASEAN Economic Ministers
were already looking beyond the first set of AIPs
when they agreed that each country would be
allowed to consider up to three AlPs at any one
time without waiting for the first one to be implemented.
At the Twelfth AEM Meeting in Kuala
Lumpur on 14-16 January 1982, the Ministers
took a further step forward when they approved
the following guidelines with regard to the implementation of AIPs:
(i) AIPs shall be allocated to host country proponents upon
nomination by AEM based on direct
submission by each country through COIME;
(ii) Once a proposed project is allocated to a
member country, that country shall have the
authority to unilaterally decide whether to go
ahead or not with the project;
(iii)Should it be decided to go ahead with the
project, each of the other four (4) member countries
shall be given an option to own a minimum of
10 percent of equity each with the additional
option to increase this to the extent of the unavailed
portion of the 40 percent of equity
reserved for the four (4) member countries. This
option will be good up to the time the call is made
for equity contribution; and
(iv) In order to give each of the four (4) member
countries a basis for deciding whether or not to
exercise its option to invest in the project, a
meeting shall be convened to discuss the feasibility
study for the project and clarify the various aspects
of the projects. Such feasibility study shall take
into account the domestic market of the host
country plus not more than 50 percent of the
import requirements of the other ASEAN countries.
This 50 percent shall not be taken to mean
an offtake commitment on the part of any member
country. It is only being considered in determining
the feasibility of the project.
The 12th AEM Meeting further agreed on a
well specified two-year time frame for the implementation
of further sets of AlPs and the following procedures:
(i) the host country will be given one year to
negotiate for the financing of its AIP. This period
would cover the conduct of a financial feasibility
study, if necessary;
(ii) if after this one-year period, there is no conclusive
decision on financing, the AEM may grant
a grace period of another year; and
(iii) if, at the end of the grace period the AIP fails
to proceed, the AEM shall decide whether it merits
further extension, or failing such decision to
extend, any other national project can automatically proceed.
In view of these new procedures and guidelines,
the 17th Meeting of COIME held in Manila
on 12-14 May 1982 agreed that there is a need to
formulate a new legal framework for subsequent
sets of AIPs. The 13th Meeting of the EM held
in Manila on 20-22 May 1982 concurred with
COIME's view and asked COIME to present this
new legal framework at the Economic Ministers'
14th Meeting in Singapore.
ASEAN Urea Project (Indonesia). As of April
1982, the overall progress of the Project was
reported as 46.4 percent complete with individual
activities completed as follows: engineering, 96.1
percent; procurement, 99.8 percent; and construction,
26.4 percent. Various categories of
personnel have either embarked on or are about
to embark on their training programmes, conducted
both locally and overseas, Such training
programmes will continue until the end of 1983.
On the basis of progress made, the estimated
completion date for the Project is late 1983 or
early 1984
ASEAN Urea Project (Malaysia). The project
ASEAN Bintulu Fertiliser Sdn Bhd (ABF)
was incorporated on 6 December 1980. As of
March 1982, the estimated cost of the project
is still held at US$327 million which is based
on 1980 prices pending the evaluation and award
of the main contract.
A loan package of 48 billion yen constituting
about 70 percent of the cost of the Project has
been negotiated with the Japanese Government.
The Exchange of Notes between the Malaysian and
Japanese Governments for such loan had been
officially concluded and signed on 4 February
1982 in Kuala Lumpur. Since 70 percent of the
loan from Japan will have to come from the Overseas
Economic Cooperation Fund (OECF) and 30
percent from the Export-import Bank of Japan,
separate loan agreements will have to be negotiated
based on the Exchange of Notes. The negotiation
with OECF has started and is expected to be
finalised soon and negotiation with the Exim Bank
will start in June 1982.
The contract for the preparation of the site
had been awarded to Taisei Corporation following
the signing of the Letter of Intent on 4 February
1982. The Project Company (ABF) has yet to
finalised the award of the Main Contract.
ASEAN Copper Fabrication Project
(Philippines). An Experts Group Meeting on the
ASEAN Copper vabrication Project (Philippines)
was held in Manila on 16-17 October 1981 to
evaluate the findings of the Project consultant commissioned
to conduct the feasibility study
for the Project. The Experts Group found the Project
economically viable and this was subsequently
confirmed by the Fifteenth COIME Meeting.
The Fifteenth COIME Meeting held in Manila
on 19-21 October 1982 agreed to the following
plant design capacity for the Project:
(i) wire rods 20,000 tons/annum
(ii) rods, bars and sections; tubes;
plates and sheets 60,000 tons/annum
Total 80,000 tons/annum
This approved capacity includes 100 percent of
ASEAN import needs excluding both the
Malaysian market as well as 40,000 tons of firmly
planned Indonesian capacity. The 20,000 tons per
annum of wire rods as well as 5,400 tons of special
purpose materials included in the above capacity
are for the national requirements of the
Philippines.
At the Twelfth AEM Meeting, the Ministers
agreed that the plant capacity of the Project be
increased to 100,000 tons with the assurance from
the Philippines that the additional capacity of
20,000 tons is intended for non-ASEAN markets.
ASEAN Rock Salt-Soda Ash Project
(Thailand). The Fifteenth Meeting of COIME in
Manila on 19-21 October 1981 adopted the Joint
Venture Agreement for the ASEAN Rock Salt-Soda
Ash Project and the Memorandum of Under-standing
and the Regulations of the ASEAN
Rock Salt-Soda Ash Industrial Company Limited.
The Meeting also recommended that the Supplementary
Agreement on the Project be initialled
by the AEM. This was subsequently done by the
Twelfth AEM Meeting for subsequent signing by
the ASEAN Foreign Ministers in June 1982.
The salient features of the Project are as
follows:
The Soda-Ash Plant sited at Ban
Nong Yai will have a production capacity of
400,000 metric tons per year of soda ash and
400,000 metric tons per year of ammonium
chloride. The Rock Salt Mine at Bamnet Narong
will have a production capacity of 1.8 million
metric tons of which 560,000 metric tons per year
will be used by the Soda-Ash Plant and the remainder
purchased by Thailand. Other raw material
inputs for the Soda-Ash Plant include 433 metric
tons per day of ammonia as well as carbon dioxide
and natural gas.
(b) Financial. The total capital requirement is
estimated at US$ 377.623 million, of which US$
327.034 or 86.6 percent are for the Soda-Ash Plant
and US$ 50.589 million or 13.4 percent are for the
Rock Salt Mine. The debt/equity ratio is 70:30 and
equity participation by member countries are 60
percent for Thailand, 13 percent for Indonesia,
Malaysia and the Philippines and one percent for
Singapore. The transfer price of rock salt at a rock
salt output level of 1.8 million tons will be fixed
such as to attain an internal rate of return on
investment (IRROI) after tax of 12.7 percent per
annum for the Rock Salt Mine. Thailand shall
undertake to supply the various material inputs
under agreed terms and also purchase all
ammonium chloride at a nitrogen nutrient content
price equal to that of imported urea from the
Indonesian and Malaysian AlPs.
On the basis of the following major assumptions
and financial parameters, the IRROI after tax
is estimated at 9.42 percent per annum:
(i) project life = 15 years
(ii) soda ash selling price (c.i.f.) in 1985 US$ 225-230 per metric ton
(iii) ammonium chloride selling price in 1985 US$ 150 per metric ton
(iv) rock salt selling price (ex-mine) in 1985 US$ 11.45 per metric ton
(v) the price of ammonia in 1985 US$ 235 per metric ton
(vi) the price of natural gas in 1981/1982 US$ 3.75 per MMBTU
(vii) transportation cost of rock salt from the rock salt mine to the soda
ash plant in 1985 = US$ 10 per metric ton.
Arrangements for Trade in AIP products
With the prospect of AlPs beginning commercial
operations in the not-too-distant future,
the attention of COIME over the year was also
increasingly directed towards the question of the
institutional mechanism for preferential trade in
AIP products. The urgency was especially felt as
provisions for such arrangements in the ASEAN
PTA, as well as in the Basic Agreement on AIPs
and Supplementary Agreements on particular AIPs,
are couched in general terms.
Aspecific question arose with regard to market
support for the ASEAN Rock Salt Soda-Ash
Project (Thailand) as a result of Indonesia's proposal
to establish a national soda-ash plant.
Indonesia undertook to guarantee offtake from the
ASEAN Project at a level that was previously
envisioned so as not to affect the viability of the
Project. To institutionalise such arrangements, the
13th AEM Meeting, upon the recommendation of
the 17th COIME Meeting, "agreed in principle to
the commitment to support offtaking of AIP
products by member countries according to their
requirements as envisioned in the project feasibility
study approved by the ASEAN Economic Ministers
provided that prices are comparable to the prevailing
world market prices generally applicable to
ASEAN before taking into account tariff preferences
enjoyed by AIPs."
On tariff preferences, the Sixteenth COIME
Meeting agreed that a substantial margin of preferences
shall be extended to products of the first
five AIPs exclusively for the first five years from
the date of commercial operation. It was envisaged
that such a preferential margin would not be less
than that enjoyed by AIC products. This was also
approved by the 13th AEM Meeting.
ASEAN Industrial Complementation
The Basic Agreement on ASEAN Industrial
Complementation was formally signed by the
Foreign Ministers at their Fourteenth Annual
Ministerial Meeting in Manila on 17-20 June 1981.
With its signing, the First Package of Existing
Automotive Components under the AIC scheme
was formally implemented. At the Twelfth AEM
Meeting it was agreed that the 50 per cent across
the board tariff cut for the products of the First
Package, as agreed to by the Ministers in their
Eleventh Meeting, would be implemented on 1
June 1982 whether or not bilateral non-tariff
preferences had been negotiated.
Bilateral negotiations on non-tariff preferences
have already begun even before the conclusion of
the Basic Agreement. However, in view of the fact
that ASEAN was venturing into such forms of
industrial cooperation for the first time, progress
was understandably slow. In addition, various
details with regard to different administrative
practices
among countries had to be sorted out. Bilateral
negotiations were held in Manila in March 1982
between Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.
With regard to the Second Package of New
Automotive Components, the following was
approved by the Tenth AEM Meeting and confirmed
by the Eleventh AEM Meeting:
Indonesia - steering systems
Malaysia - headlights for motor vehicles
Philippines - heavy duty rear axles for commercial vehicles
Singapore - fuel injection pumps
Thailand - carburettors.
At the Fifteenth Meeting of COIME in Manila
on 19-21 October 1981, it was agreed that for the
purpose of implementing this Second Package a
period of two years be adopted. Specifically,
1 January 1984 or the actual date of start-up,
whichever comes first, shaII be set as the start-up
date for the implementation of this Second
Package.
At the Twelfth AEM Meeting, Singapore's
allocated component of "Fuel Injection Pumps"
was replaced by "Differential Gears for Motor
Vehicles".
In view of the technical complexities involved
and the need for a clear definition of product
coverage, the Sixteenth Meeting of COIME drew
up precise descriptions for all products in the
Second Package. The Meeting was however
informed that Thailand wished to substitute front
and rear wheel hubs for passenger cars and commercial
vehicles in place of carburettors. The
Meeting was also informed that headlights as well
as differential gears were currently being produced
in the ASEAN region, and both Malaysia and
Singapore would have to review their product
allocation for the Second Package.
In view of the difficulties in defining the coverage
of automotive components or assemblies, particularly
in allocating these among the ASEAN countries,
the 17th COIME Meeting agreed to deferinalisation
of the Second Package pending a thorough review
of the Guidelines for product identification
and allocation, and the AIC package. It was
also agreed to convene the Fifth Meeting of the
Experts Group on the Automotive Industry sometime
in August 1982, to be attended by the
COIME leaders of delegations. The Experts Group
will study, among other things, the possibility of
brand-to-brand complementation.
ASEAN Industrial Joint Ventures
As conceived, ASEAN Industrial Joint
Ventures (AIJVS) are private sector equivalents
enjoying exclusivity privileges similar to AIC
products. In view of the modifications to the Basic
Agreement on AIC as initialed by the Eleventh
AEM Meeting, specifically as regards exclusivity
privileges, the draft Basic Agreement on AIJVs as
presented to the Fifteenth COIME Meeting was
also similarly revised.
Discussion at the Fifteenth COIME Meeting on
the AIJV centred mainly on the scope of the joint
ventures (i.e. whether it should be extended to
include non-industrial sectors), the extent of
non-ASEAN equity participation, and the nature
of preferential trading arrangements.
The various issues regarding AIJVs were
discussed by the Twelfth AEM Meeting. On the
scope of AIJVs, it was felt that it shoed be limited
to industrial ventures though such a scheme can be
subsequently extended to other sectors. As the
discussions revealed further complexities, the
scheme was referred back to COIME for further
study.
An important element of the AIJV scheme, as
contrasted with the AIC scheme, is its greater
flexibility. For example, an AIJV requires only
two participant countries instead of four for an
AIC package. Also, while a given package under the
AIC scheme must comprise products in a given
industrial sector, a given scheme of AIJVs can
comprise ventures from different industrial sectors.
At the Sixteenth COIME, therefore, some member
countries proposed further conceptual changes to
the AIJV scheme in order to give it even greater
flexibility and further improve its attractiveness to
the private sector. The most important is the
concept of freedom of location whereby the
private sector is free to locate projects anywhere
within the territories of the participating member
countries in a given scheme of AIJV products.
At the 17th COIME meeting the various
concepts were orchestrated in greater detail in a
list of Guiding Principles and Procedures for
the AIJV scheme and it is expected that these
Principles and Procedures would be incorporated
into a final draft Agreement for the approval
of the AEM.
Cooperation on Minerals
Further to the formulation of the proposed
ASEAN Minerals Cooperation Plan by the COIME
Working Group on Minerals at its Fourth Meeting
in Bangkok on 9-12 January 1981, various proposals
for cooperation under the Plan were
presented by member countries and considered at
the First Meeting of ASEAN Experts Working
Group on Minerals, which replaced the former
Working Group, in Bangkok on 8-9 February 1982.
After due consideration, the Experts Working
Group agreed on the following three priority
projects:
(a) Beneficiation and Marketing of Kaolin. It
was agreed that the proposals in this regard serve
the interest of all member countries and consequently
a project study on the beneficiation and
marketing of kaolin shall be initiated by member
countries with Indonesia as the study coordinator.
(b) Beneficiation of Low Grade Barite. It was
recognised that this would be of great importance
to the growing chemical industry in the region.
Thailand shall initiate a study, in cooperation with
other member countries, on the beneficiation and
marketing of low grade barite.
(c) Establishment of an ASEAN Training
Centre for Mine Safety and Health. Safety and
health in both soft-ground and hard-rock mining is
a common ASEAN concern and hence it was
agreed that such a centre be established. The
Philippines shall host the facilities for this project
and act as country coordinator. Invitations for
training participation shall be extended to other
member countries.
At the 17th COIME Meeting it was decided
that a Seminar for Kaolin experts be held in Indonesia
in August 1982. COIME also agreed to seek
third country funding for the feasibility studies on
the Low Grade Barite Project and the establishment
of the ASEAN Training Centre on Mine
Safety and Health.
ASEAN Cooperation on Energy
The Third Meeting of ASEAN Senior Officials
on Energy Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur on
9-11 September 1981 recommend to the AEM on
Energy Cooperation the creation of a Coal Information
Centre and to instruct the Experts Group on
Coal to (I ) determine the feasibility of setting up a
Regional Coal Depots, (2) determine the need
for joint procurement of coal and propose the
implementing mechanics, if this need is established;
and (3) prioritize the other recommendations on
ASEAN coal cooperation a proposed by the
Experts Group on Coal in their first meeting in
Bandung and approved at the Second AEM on
Energy Cooperation held in Kuala Lumpur on 27
April 1981.
These recommendations were reiterated at the
next SOM on Energy held in Manila on October 6,
1981, prior to the Third AEM on Energy Cooperation,
Manila, 8-9 October 1981. The Third AEM on
Energy Cooperation confirmed the above recommendations.
As to the establishment of the Coal
Information Centre the AEM on Energy agreed
that the centre be established in Thailand.
The Second Meeting of the ASEAN Experts
Group on Coal was held in Kuala Lumpur on 4-5
February 1982. This Meeting recommended the
following: (1) development of coal centres in the.
member countries to service wider areas and
subsequently interlink them to form a regional
distribution network; and (2) development of a
joint approach to joint procurement of coal in the
long-term.
The Meeting also recommended the following
as regards cooperation on coal matters: (1 ) to
conduct a joint coal market survey; (2) to conduct
studies on the distribution and utilization of coal;
(3) to develop joint cooperation in coal with third
parties; (4) to develop coal resources; and (5) to
acquire coal technology and training.
In the long-term, the Meeting proposed joint
undertakings in survey and exploration, in coal
mine development, in coal exchanges and in coal
emergency sharing.
ASEAN Cooperation in Power Utilities/Authorities
The Task Force on Power Utilities that was
formed at the Third Meeting of the Senior Officials
on Energy Cooperation to prepare courses of
actions related to cooperative projects in power
recommended (1 ) that the focal point country
responsible for each project nominates a coordinator;
(2) that each respective country form a
working group responsible for each of the projects.
These recommendations were subsequently
adopted by the third meeting of the AEM on
Energy Cooperation.
Ten working groups were established in each
of the following projects: microhydro development;
computer applications; interconnection;
research, development and engineering; training;
geothermal development; nuclear power for
electric power generation; rural and urban
electrification; standardization and the development
of an electric power information centre.
For more information, please refer to the project details