INRODUCTION
The year 1988 - 1989 could be characterized
as another period of follow-up actions to further
promote and strengthen ASEAN cooperation in
line with the directions and guidelines laid down
by the Third Meeting of the ASEAN Heads of
Government. ASEAN activities under the purview
of various ASEAN Committees and their related
organs have progressed smoothly and satisfactorily.
The year under review also witnessed greater
participation by the private sector in ASEAN cooperative
endeavours. Significantly, a sense of fresh
and positive outlook was injected into the various
dialogue relationships so as to make the overall
dialogue more dynamic and fruitful to all the
parties concerned. Conscientious efforts were made
to further enhance the efficacy and efficiency of
ASEAN cooperation. Overall, ASEAN has satisfactorily
maintained the impetus initiated by the
Third Meeting of the ASEAN Heads of
Government by turning new ideas into concrete
steps and also consolidating the existing cooperative
measures.
ASEAN has also strengthened the idea of
ASEAN - Pacific Cooperation of Human Resources
Development (APC-HRD) by putting an end to the
two year moratorium on the APC-HRD
Programme, due to the decision on this matter by
the Twenty-First ASEAN Ministerial Meeting,
Bangkok, July 1988. Officials from ASEAN
countries and dialogue partners concerned
convened two meetings of th Ad-Hoc Working
Group on APC-HRD on 7 March 1989 and 19 May
1989 respectively in Jakarta. The meetings made
some progress in reviewing the existing projects
and assessing the new ones.
In the field of finance and banking, the
policy initiatives embodied in the Programme of
Action endorsed by the Third Meeting of the
ASEAN Heads of Government were further
solidified and concretized. The ASEAN
Reinsurance Corporation, a major private sector
undertaking aiming to promote intra-ASEAN trade
in reinsurance business was incorporated in
Singapore on 17 December 1988 and expected to
commence its commercial operations in the latter
part of 1989. Its initial authorized capital was
changed from S$ 20 million to S$ 30 million.
Progress was also made in promoting and
facilitating the use of ASEAN currencies for the
intra-ASEAN trade while the project to explore
and assess the possibility of extending their use for
intra-ASEAN investment has been formulated and
submitted for UNDP funding, Furthermore, the
training programmes to enhance the efficiency of
the tax and customs administrators as well as the
insurance commisions are now being implemented.
The Period under review witnessed activities
of ASEAN member countries in implementing the
new commodity classification system or the
Harmonized System. Brunei Darussalam was
making arrangements for the conversion from the
CCCN System to the Harmonized System, which
has become effective in other member countries.
Also as an effort to further promoting trade flows,
the ASEAN Customs Authorities were presented
with the private sector views on customs
operations and procedures. The role of Customs
Administrators in facilitating the ASEAN
Preferential Trading Arrangement (PTA) received
serious attention of the authorities concerned with
a result that member countries decided to carry
out a study on their respective import and export
procedures.
Member countries have continued to use the
Intra-ASEAN Model of Double Taxation Convention
as a guidance in negotiating with third countries
for the avoidance of double taxation with
satisfactory results. Furthermore, COFAB as the
body assigned to monitor the ASEAN-Japan Development
Fund (AJDF) has established a
framework to oversee its implementation and
utilization, both for loan and equity portions of
the Fund. To further tap long-term capital from
international sources, the ASEAN Banking Council
took yet another initiative through the establishment
of the ASEAN Fund Limited, a US$ 150
million close-ended fund to be invested in
companies operating in ASEAN. Launched successfully
in November 1988, the Fund provides an
opportunity for the international investors to
participate in the development of ASEAN economies.
A noteworthy progress in the field of food,
agriculture and forestry was the approval of the
revised regulations for "Importation of
Recreational Animals and Zoo Wild Animals" by
the Tenth Meeting of the ASEAN Ministers on
Agriculture and Forestry held in Kuala Lumpur in
October 1988. The revision of the aforesaid
regulations was made as a follow up action to the
Ministers' agreement on "Standardization on
Import and Quarantine Regulations on Animals
and Animal Products".
In forestry, the ASEAN - New Zealand
Afforestation Project (ANZAP) located in Tarlac,
Philippines has been successfully completed. As an
offshoot of that project, the Philippines is now
engaged in a bilateral project with New Zealand,
known as the "RP-New Zealand Bukidnon
Industrial Tree Plantation Project". The said
project aims to establish 14,000 hectares of
commercially viable and sustainable forest
plantation in Bukidnon that will provide an
alternative wood resource to the rapidly depleting
indigenous timber supply and create long-term
income earning opportunities for the local
inhabitants.
To further enhance cooperation in this field,
the ASEAN Ministers on Agriculture and Forestry
endorsed the proposal to establish the ASEAN
Corporation in Food, Agriculture and Forestry
which would promote national and ASEAN
interests; seek greater market share for ASEAN
products; provide a vehicle for ASEAN private
sector initiative supportive of regional development
and encourage the flow of investment in
food, agriculture and forestry. The Ministers also
endorsed a number of new project proposals which
include projects on Integrating Farm Mechanization
into the Agricultural Extension Services in
ASEAN Countries (FARMEX), ASEAN Regional
Programme for Farm Women in Agriculture Development,
and ASEAN Goat and Sheep Development Programme.
In fisheries, the private sector took an active
part in the regional cooperative programmes
marking a significant agenda of their involvement
in ASEAN cooperation. In December 1988, a
"Fisheries Forum� was successfully convened in
Jakarta, in which both ASEAN public and private
sectors representatives participated. The Forum
agreed that in order to accelerate the development
of the fisheries sector in the region, a number of
joint programmes of activities should immediately
be implemented. The private sectors also supported
the establishment of ASEAN Fisheries Consultative
Body for a more effective coordination of the
activities.
The Committee on Industry, Minerals and
Energy (COIME) held its Thirtieth, Thirty-first
and Thirty-second Meetings in Manila, Bangkok
and Baguio City on 9-11 August 1988, 1-3
February 1989 and 7-9 June 1989, respectively. As
a follow-up on the implementation of the decisions
of the Third Meeting of the ASEAN Heads of
Government held in Manila in December 1987, the
meetings reviewed the progress of the ASEAN
Industrial Joint Venture (AIJV) programme and
the prospects and approaches to generating more
projects under the programme particularly in the
light of the new incentives and privileges available
thereunder. Exchange of information on national
industrial policies and plans have likewise been
started again in line with the Third Meeting of the
ASEAN Heads of Government mandate.
Meanwhile deliberations in COIME also
resulted in the signing, by the ASEAN Economic
Ministers (AEM), of a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) on Brand-to-Brand Complementation
on the Automotive Industry under the Basic
Agreement on ASEAN Industrial Complementation (BAAIC).
Actual implementation of the terms
of the MOU took place with the recent approval of
five brand to brand complementation schemes or
packages.
In the energy fields meetings by the ASEAN
Economic Ministers on Energy Cooperation,
(AEM-EC) have been held yearly to foster and
promote energy cooperation among ASEAN Member
Countries. In 1988, the Seventh Meeting of the
AEM-EC was held in Brunei Darussalam and in
June 1989 the Eighth Meeting was held in Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia. The Eighth Meeting of the
AEM-EC again reaffirmed the need to cooperate
closely on energy matter so as to use energy
sources efficiently. The Meeting focussed on cooperation
on the utilization of the gas pipeline
projects for the mutual benefit of the member
countries concerned. To date, cooperation has
been achieved in the areas of power utilities, coal,
and new and renewable sources of energy, as well
as those contained in the two Agreements,
namely, the ASEAN Energy Cooperation
Agreement and the ASEAN Petroleum Security
Supply Agreement. The ASEAN - Energy
Management Training and Research Centre
(AEEMTRC) located in Jakarta was officially
inaugurated on 8 November 1988. The AEEMTRC
is aimed at strengthening cooperation among
ASEAN countries and between ASEAN and the
European Community (EC) in the field of energy
through appropriate energy management to secure
energy supplies for economic and social
development. The AEEMTRC will undertake
such activities by organizing exchange of research
results and energy researchers, supporting energy
research activities, and training energy planners and
experts of the ASEAN countries. Meanwhile, 2
workshops on energy management related subject
have been conducted at the Centre and a third one
is scheduled to be held in Kuala Lumpur in July
1989.
Recognizing the important supporting role
that could be played by the transport and communications
sector in accelerating growth and
development, the Committee on Transportation
and Communications (COTAC) . undertook
activities to implement the various recommendations
of the ASEAN Economic Ministers (AEM)
endorsed by the Third Meeting of the ASEAN
Heads of Government in 1987 which provided new
directions for the orderly development of a more
efficient and improved ASEAN transportation and
communications services. Various measures were
adopted to ensure the speedy implementation of
the recommendations such as urging the Sub-committees
under COTAC to play a leading role in
translating the initiatives into practicable programmes
and specific -projects to attain their
objectives, and persuading the World Bank, Asian
Development Bank and other international
organizations to provide assistance for the realization
of COTAC projects. The private sector was
also urged to play a more active role to complement
efforts undertaken by the ASEAN Governments
under the ASEAN framework.
In the area of shipping, further progress was
made in the establishment of the Brokers
Telegraph System, Inter-ASEAN Bulk Pool System
and Point to Point Shipping Services while further
steps are being taken to strengthen the existing
Freight Booking and Cargo Consolidation Centres
and to establish new ones to enable ASEAN
Shippers to obtain the best possible terms.
Assitance from the World Bank is also being sought
to implement the proposed ASEAN Transportation
Network Project, which will involve the
strengthening of the existing modes of transportation
system and the establishment of a new road/
rails/shipping/ferry/air links. The successful implementation
of these measures would further
enhance ASEAN economic cooperation as, a whole
and eventually increase the contribution of this
sector in the regional growth and development
process.
Marked progress was made in implementing
the ASEAN Manila Summit decisions to enhance
intra-ASEAN trade through improvement of the
PTA (Preferential Trading Arrangement) by
increasing the number of PTA items and further
deepening of Margin of Preference (MOP) on the
existing PTA list. With the completion of the 1988
PTA programme, 1679 items have been removed
from the Exclusion Lists and introduced into the
PTA List with a minimum MOP of 25%, thus
bringing the total PTA items to 14,462.
Furthermore, 3261 items from the existing PTA
list would be enjoying deepening of MOP. Upon
the completion of the 1989 programmes, another
335 items from the Exclusion Lists will have been
introduced into the PTA List and 2848 existing
PTA items will enjoy furhter deepening of MOP.
On the implementation of the Summit
decision of Standstill and Roolback of Non-Tariff
Barriers, member countries (except Brunei
Darussalam and Indonesia) have submitted 70
requests for rollback of NTBs for negotiations of
which preliminary negotiations for some NTBs are
underway. It is expected that over the next few
COTT meetings, some of these NTBs would be
rolled back.
On intra-ASEAN cooperation in the field of
commodities, COTT has set up an Ad-Hoc Working
Group on commodities to consider ways and
means to implement the eight-point new initiatives
decided by the Third Meeting of the ASEAN Heads
of Government. COTT has adopted the guidelines
which form part of the overall plan of action to
implement these initiatives. Following this,
ASEAN member countries have submitted their
lists of commodities of priority interest to them
and have also agreed to the division of work to
implement the plan of action. COTT has also
agreed to the concept and functions of the ASEAN
Data Bank on Commodities (ADBC) and that its
establishment should be on a step by step
approach. As a step to examine further the requirements
of the ADBC, a management and computer
experts group would be established, and that the
ASEAN Secretariat was asked to look into the
financial requirements and terms of reference for
this group.
The Twentieth Meeting of ASEAN
Economic Ministers held in Pattaya, Thailand in
October 1988 endorsed the recommendations of
the Twenty Fifth COTT Meeting on joint
approaches to the international commodity issues,
namely the anti-tropical timber campaigns, the
farm subsidies offered by the major developed
countries, the anti-tropical vegetable oil
campaign and the establishment of the Common
Fund. The Meeting also endorsed that an ASEAN
Ministerial delegation would be organized to
counter the anti-tropical timber campaign
depending on the seriousness of the situation.
Following the signing of the Agreement on
the Establishment of the ASEAN Tourism
Information Centre (ATIC) on 26 September 1988
and the subsequent ratification of the Agreement
by the six ASEAN countries, the Centre, located in
Kuala Lumpur, has become operational. ATIC,
besides being an administrative arm of the Sub-Committee
on Tourism (SCOT) and an
information centre on ASEAN tourism, will
undertake promotional activities to vitalize intra-ASEAN
travel, thus increasing the flow of tourists
among the ASEAN countries as well as attracting
more foreign tourists into the region.
Forward-looking attitude to the Third
Meeting of the ASEAN Heads of Government was
made evident again in the field of ASEAN cooperation
in science and technoloqy. This cooperation
reached another milestone when the
Fourth Meeting of the ASEAN Minister for
Science and Technology held in Manila in January
1989 approved the ASEAN Plan of Action on
Science and Technology and agreed to initiate the
ASEAN Science Fund with seed contributions
from member countries amounting to US$ 50,000
Per member country. The ASEAN Plan of Action
on Science and Technology, which involves a restructuring
of the subsidiary bodies of the ASEAN
Committee on Science and Technology (COST).
calls for: the implementation of joint regional
research and development projects; establishment
of regional research networks, network-like
linkages,. centers of excellence, and science parks;
operation of pilot and demonstration plants; development
of human resources and dissemination of information.
The ASEAN Committee on Science and
Technology continued to make progress in
enhancing ASEAN cooperation in science and
technology. The ASEAN Food Conference, with
the theme "Food Science and Technology in
Industrial Development", and the Second ASEAN
Science and Technology Week, with the overall
theme of "New and Emerging Technologies in
ASEAN". were successfully held in Bangkok in
October 1988 and in Manila in January 1989
respectively. Project feasibility studies for joint
regional research and development projects in the
areas of food science and technology, biotechnology,
energy, microelectronics, and marine sciences
were conducted for Phase II of the ASEAN-Australia
Economic Cooperation Programme. In
the environmental field, it has been agreed that a
common ASEAN stand on sustainable development
will be adopted by ASEAN respresentatives
in the governing bodies of U.N. agencies, in line
with the Manila Declaration of 1987. In brief,
ASEAN cooperation in the field of science and
technology has been serving as an unassuming but
solid basis for ASEAN prosperity relying on both
innovation and practicability.
During the year under review, the ASEAN
Committee on Culture and Information (COCI)
successfully implemented a total of twenty-six
projects. A total sum of US$ 2,123,082 was
disbursed to member countries for the implementation
of these projects. This amount was about
US$ 700,000.00 more than the expenditure during
the preceding year. The improved financial
situation was partly a result of better financial
monitoring and supervision by member countries
which had contributed to some saving from
projects implementation. As in previous years
projects under the ASEAN COCI were mainly in
the four major areas: visual and performing arts,
literary,, and ASEAN studies, print and
interpersonal media, radio/TV/film and video.
ASEAN COCI also adopted a strategy that it would
coordinate its activities with ASEAN Sub-Committee
on Tourism in ASEAN's efforts to
promote the "Visit ASEAN Year" on VAY 1992.
This was a significant move in the overall coordination
of ASEAN activities so as to achieve
maximum efficiency.
In the year under review, the Committee on
Social and Development (COSD) continued to
pursue the implementation of projects in a wide
range of areas including Population, Health and
Nutrition, Youth, Women and Labour. The
highlight of ASEAN cooperation on labour was the
7th ASEAN Labour Ministers Meeting (ALMM)
held on 13 - 14 October 1988 in Bali, Indonesia.
The ASEAN Labour Ministers discussed and exchanged
views on, among others, the increasing
protectionists barriers and practices which
adversely affect industrial relations, employment
and productivity, as well as laying down broad
guidelines for future collaborations and cooperation
among ASEAN member countries in the field
of Labour.
The year 1989 saw the continued close cooperation
and rapport among the ASEAN member
countries in their concerted efforts to prevent and
control the drug menace in the region.
Guided by the Five-Year Programme of
Action endorsed and adopted by the 11th Meeting
of ASEAN Senior Officials on Drug Matters
(ASOD) and the Comprehensive Multidisciplinary
Outline (CMO) in future drug activities adopted by
the UN International Conference on Drug Abuse
and Illicit Trafficking (ICDAIT) in 1987, member
countries have been formulating regional and
domestic activities and plans of action to check the
flow of illicit drugs as well as the abuse of drugs in
the region with vigour. And as a result of the 12th
ASOD held in Bangkok on 23 - 29 May 1989,
member countries were determined to improve the
implementation of drug-related projects by
adopting appropriate measures.
With regard to the private sector participation
in ASEAN Meetings and Activities, the 5th
Meeting of the 22nd ASEAN Standing Committee,
Bandar Seri Begawan, 23 - 25 May 1989 considered
and adopted the amendment of the revised
Guidelines on Private Sector Participation in
ASEAN Meetings and Activities proposed by the
ASEAN Secretariat with a view to facilitate and
promote the role of private sector particularly in
the dialogue process.
The year under review witnessed another
rotation of the ASEAN coordinatorship of
dialogue countries, taking effect from the Post
Ministerial Conference (PMC) of the Twenty-First
ASEAN Ministerial Meeting in July 1988 onwards
for a period of three years. The dialogue
relationship continued smoothly, but with awareness
of both the ASEAN countries and the
dialogue partners of the need to streamline the
dialogue process so as to create more dynamism.
Efforts were also undertaken to make assistance
projects more efficacious and meaningful. Some
dialogue partners seemed to desire to bring in the
concept of equitability. However, ASEAN
succeeded in maintaining its drive for the
elimination of trade barriers and for development
assistance particularly regarding Human Resources
Development (HRD).
During this period, ASEAN held dialogue
meetings with Japan in September 1988, New
Zealand in November 1988, the European
Community in November/December 1988 and
Australia in May 1989. The dialogue meetings with
the United States, Japan and Canada will be held in
the second half of 1989.
The Memorandum of Understanding for the
implementation of ASEAN - Australia Economic
Cooperation Programme (AAECP) Phase 11 was
signed by the ASEAN and Australian sides during
the Post Ministerial Conference in Bangkok in, July
1988. The AAECP Phase II would commence on 1
July 1989 for the period of five years. During the
year under review, both sides also held the 12th
ASEAN - Australian Forum in Perth, Australia on
15 - 16 May 1989. ASEAN and Australia took the
opportunity to reaffirm their determination to cooperate
closely on the Uruguay Round and the
international commodities issues. Furthermore,
ASEAN agreed to give careful thought and consideration
to the Australian proposal for an
enhanced regional economic cooperation for the
countries in the Pacific.
Also at the 12th Forum, ASEAN once again
expressed its concern over existing and potential
obstacles to trade and investment relations
between the two sides. In this regard, ASEAN and
Australia undertook to eliminate such obstacles.
However, the 12th Forum witnessed a new
and significant development, namely, the active
participation by the representatives of the private
sectors of both ASEAN and Australian sides. This
has evidently strengthened the efforts of ASEAN
and Australia in making the dialogue more
dynamic.
The ASEAN - Canada Economic Cooperation
Agreement was renewed for a further period
of two years, beginning 1 June 1989. Such renewal
has demonstrated the importance ASEAN
and Canada have attached to the dialogue relations
and their desire for the cooperation to be further
developed and broadened. In October 1988, the
ASEAN Senior Trade Officials met the Canadian
Ambassador for International Trade and Associate
Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs to
exchange views on regional and international
economic issues of mutual interest. In the area of
development cooperation, the year under review
saw the signing of the Memorandum of
Understanding of the ASEAN-Canada cooperation
in the Ku Band Propagation Measurement Programme
on Earth Space Paths. ASEAN expressed
the need. for more positive cooperation with
Canada in the Uruguay Round particularly in the
areas of agriculture and tropical products so as to
bring about fuller trade liberalization and better
market access for such products. In March 1989, a
project design mission, led by two consultants
from Canada, visited ASEAN member countries to
discuss the ASEAN - Canada Regional Training
Programme.
The Eighth Meeting of the ASEAN - EC
Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) was held in
Brussels in 30 November - 2 December 1988. The
Meeting reviewed the progress of the implementation
of the Cooperation Agreement and the activities
undertaken to follow up the results of the
Seventh ASEAN- EC Ministerial Meeting (AEMM)
held in Dusseldorf in May 1988. It was also noted
that the EC financial facility had been launched,
on a pilot basis, to promote joint ventures between
EC firms and prospective partners from some
developing countries including the ASEAN countries.
The new facility is expected to be
instrumental in increasing the interest of European
enterprises, especially medium scale ventures to
participate in industrial cooperation in the ASEAN
region. Capping the initiatives taken to pursue
ASEAN-EC cooperation in the industrial field,
the 8th JCC also adopted the Joint Memorandum
on ASEAN-EC Industrial Cooperation as the basic
framework for future activities between the two
regions, thus finalizing the action plan for the
pursuit of cooperative endeavours in the field of
industry. It was agreed that the functioning of the
Joint Investment Committees (JICs) could still be
improved and their scope of activities be
broadened. Both sides clearly acknowledged the
need to improve the implementation of the inter-regional
development cooperation. On international
commodity issues, the JCC noted the
requests in the ASEAN Memorandum particularly
on ASEAN's concern on the possible negative
effects on trade in tropical timber as a result of the
negative campaigns carried out by the environmentalist groups.
The JCC also discussed the implication of a
Single European Market in 1992. The EC
responded to ASEAN concern by giving its
assurance that ASEAN would be in a favourable
position to benefit from the new environment in
1992 as it would increase opportunities for
ASEAN to enlarge its market. The JCC agreed to
examine ASEAN's interest in associating the
ASEAN - EC private sectors in the future dialogue
process. The Meeting agreed to the strategy, the
objectives, the modalities, the criteria, the instruments
as well as the budgetary implications for
future Science and Technology cooperation.
During this Meeting, a concrete step to establish
permanent scientific cooperation between ASEAN
and EC was taken through the creation of Joint
Scientific Ventures and Technical Assistance
Actions.
The Tenth ASEAN - Japan Forum in Tokyo
in September 1988, attached great importance to
the Mid-Term Review of the Uruguay Round of
Multilateral Trade Negotiations, not only in giving
impetus to the negotiation but also in accommodating
the legitimate concern and interest as well as
development priorities of developing countries. It
also discussed issues regarding investment and
industrial cooperation with emphasis on the
importance of taking measures aimed at increasing
the flow of Japanese investments to ASEAN as
well. as investment and industrial cooperation
opportunities presently available under several
existing regional industrial cooperation
programmes.
ASEAN welcomed Japan's new economic
policy to improve a sound world trading environment,
improve market access and play more active
role in the growth of the Asia Pacific region.
ASEAN also appreciated Japan's gesture in lifting
Japan quantitative restrictions on certain agricultural
and commodity products, but expressed
the need for Japan to further enhance trade cooperation
between the two regions by eliminating
protectionist policies, including tariff and trade
restrictive measures.
The Ninth Meeting of the ASEAN New
Zealand Dialogue was held in Yogyakarta,
Indonesia in November 1988. It was noted that
while dialogue relations in general had improved,
trade between ASEAN and New Zealand had
deteriorated in recent years, particularly the
decline in ASEAN exports to New Zealand due to
New Zealand's increased self-sufficiency in oil
needs. It was further expected that the liberalization
of New Zealand's trade regime and the economic
restructuring would create new opportunities
for ASEAN exports. Regarding the
ANZCERTA, New Zealand indicated that it had
completed a full review of ANZCERTA in August
1988. The target date for full free trade had been
brought forward from 1995 to I July 1990. On
development cooperation, discussions on the
proposed projects of the Trade and Investment
Promotion Package (TIPP) and the Inter-Institutional
Linkages Programme (IILP) have been
finalized for immediate implementation. Although
the Government of New Zealand has previously
stated that for the FY 1988-1989 it would reduce
its ODA to ASEAN fom NZ $ 2.8 million to NZ$
2.1 million because of severe economic pressure
the situation has changed. Due to some available
unspent fund towards the end of the Financial
Year, the New Zealand Government has decided to
provide additional funds for the expenditure under
the ASEAN Programme in 1988/1989 from
NZ$ 2.1 million to NZ$ 2,401 million.
The ASEAN - US cooperation in trade and
development has gained further momentum, as
exemplified by the developments concerning the
ASEAN - US Initiative (AUI), the proposed
ASEAN - US Future Development Cooperation
Programmes and the ASEAN - US Automated Data
Exchange (ADE). A joint study on the AU I by the
ASEAN and US researchers has been completed
and submitted to the ASEAN and US government
and Trade Opportunities Project) with
emphasis on the promotion of trade and investment
activities will also have private sector participation
in management of projects as a new feature.
After the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding
on the Establishment of Automated Data
Exchange (ADE) as the umbrella agreement on 8
July 1988 in Bangkok, ASEAN member countries
have started to discuss with the US Consultants on
the implementation of the ADE project.
On the Uruguay Round, the Eighth ASEAN-US
Dialogue stressed on the commonality of
interest and expected positive progress in the
negotiations particularly on tropical products and
agriculture. On commodities, the Meeting noted
the support to bring INRA 11 into force and also
the continued support of the Administration to
oppose the discriminatory labelling bill on tropical
vegetable oils.
The period under review is the beginning of
the third year of the ASEAN - UNDP Fourth Inter-Country
Programme (1987 - 1991). Significant
progress has been made in expediting the approval
and execution of project documents. A total of
nine project documents have been signed. To
accommodate projects which have already been
approved outside the Third Meeting of the Aid
Coordinators (MAC 111), UNDP has approved an
increased amount of US$ 2,425,291 to be added to
the current approved budget allocation of
US$ 10,273,347 for the Fourth ICP.
The Fourth Meeting of the Aid Coordinators
(MAC IV) and the Mid-Term Review of the Fourh
Inter-Country Programme was held in Jakarta on
13-14 March 1989. The Meeting expressed concern
over the slow rate of project delivery and fund
disbursement both in the Third Cycle and the
present Fourth Cycle. ASEAN has taken note of
such concern. For the present Cycle, ASEAN has
submitted 4 new project proposals for UNDP
funding consideration. Meanwhile, UNDP has also
offered to include five project proposals
specifically for ASEAN. This new package has been
designed to enable the ICP to directly assist the developing
countries in the Asia and the Pacific in
promoting their capabilities to respond to and cope
with the issues and problems which they are likely
to face in the 21st Century.
During the past decade, a major obstacle to
the promotion of peace and stability in the region
has been the Vietnamese occupation of
Kampuchea.
The blatant aggression of Vietnam against
Kampuchea has brought suffering to the Kampuchean
people and nation and is a threat to inter-national
peace and security. ASEAN has been and
remains active in its efforts to bring about a comprehensive
political settlement to this 10-year-old
problem. ASEAN is convinced that any political
solution to this problem must be comprehensive
just and durable. ASEAN believes that there should
be a comprehensive political solution to the
problem where there must be the total withdrawal
of Vietnamese forces from Kampuchea to allow
the Kampucheans to exercise the right of self-determination,
There must be an international control
mechanism with some peace keeping elements
to undertake control and supervision. ASEAN
looks forward to the emergence of Kampuchea as.
an independent, sovereign, neutral and non-aligned
nation posing no threat to its neighbours.
ASEAN has consistently carried on diplomatic
efforts to bring about such a political settlement.
Indonesia as the interlocutor of ASEAN
convened the First Jakarta Informal Meeting
(JIM: 1), 25-28 July 1988 followed by the First
Working Group Meeting held in Jakarta on 17-20
October 1988. JIM I provided for the first time the
opportunity for discussions among the parties
directly involved and other concerned countries,
At the Meeting, a common understanding was
reached on the need to comprehensively solve the
Kampuchean problem through political means, so
as to establish an independent, sovereign, peaceful,
neutral and non-aligned Kampuchea on the basis of
self-determination and national reconciliation.
Recent developments have given some reasons for
optimism and indicated that ASEAN's vigorous
efforts have begun to bear fruits. During the past
year ASEAN's pursuit of the solution to this
problem included a special Foreign Ministers
Meeting in Bandar Seri Begawan on 21 January
1989 to discuss and assess the developments on the
Kampuchean problem. The Foreign Ministers
decided to hold the Second Jakarta Informal
Meeting (JIM I 1) in Jakarta, in February 1989, as a
follow up of the First Jakarta Informal Meeting.
The Second Jakarta lnformal Meeting
(JIM 11) was held in Jakarta on 19-21 February
1989 preceded by the Second Working Group
Meeting held in Jakarta on 16-18 February 1989.
The meeting extensively discussed the parameters
of the substantive aspects for a settlement as
contained in the consensus statement of the
Chairman of the Jakarta Informal Meeting,
touching on the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces,
the prevention of the recurrence of genocidal
policies and practices of the Pol Pot regime,
cessation of all foreign interference,
an international control mechanism, general elections, the
establishment of peace and stability in Southeast.
Asia and the convening of an international conference.
While JIM II resulted in some progress in
the search of a comprehensive, political settlement,
many divergences remain to be narrowed down and
settled between and among the parties directly
involved and the parties concerned in the
Kampuchean conflict. Therefore, there is need to
further intensify ASEAN efforts towards a Kampuchean settlement.
Due cognizance to the efforts,
of Indonesia, as interlocutor of ASEAN, should be
given for initiating the Jakarta Informal Meeting
(JIM) process.
At the 43rd United Nations General
Assembly of 1988, ASEAN's draft Resolution on
the situation in Kampuchea was passed with an
overwhelming support by the United Nations
members. There were 84 Co-sponsors as compared
to 83 in 1987 and the result of the voting was
122-18-13 as compared to 117-21-18 in 1987.
The continuous and seemingly endless flow
of Indochinese refugees and displaced persons into
the ASEAN region is another problem which has,
for the past 14 years, posed heavy social, economic
and security burdens on the ASEAN
member countries providing temporary first refuge.
The inability of countries-of-origin in Indochina to
put an end to the mass, clandestine and
economically-motivated outflow of their citizens
coupled with the proliferation of refugee camp
population in the ASEAN region due to a steady
decline in the resettlement rate has prompted
ASEAN member countries to individually and
jointly engage in on-going bilateral and multilateral
discussions with parties concerned to find a viable
solution to the problem. With the successful
convening of Preparatory Meeting for the International
Conference on 7-9 March 1989 in Kuala
Lumpur. The International Conference on lndochinese
Refugees was held in Geneva from 13-14
June 1989.
During the 21st AMM. the ASEAN Foreign
Ministers issued a statement calling for the convening
of an international Conference on lndochinese
refugees at ministerial level under. the
auspices of the UNSG in 1989 to formulate a new
comprehensive plan of action on Indochinese
refugees, which was subsequently endorse by the
43/119 of 8 December 1988. Consequently,
ASEAN member countries along with other parties
concerned, including the UNHCR produced a draft
Declaration and Comprehensive Plan of Action
which consists of a balanced comprehensive set of
measures designed to solve the Indochinese problem
in a humanitarian manner acceptable to all
parties concerned. The draft was endorsed by the
Preparatory Meeting for the International Conference
on lndochinese Refugees held in Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia on 7-9 March 1989, and was
subsequently adopted at the International Conference
in Geneva on 13-14 June 1989.